FREE 3270 EMULATOR FOR MAC GITHUB CODE
As teams grow larger, they shift to alternative solutions since Github doesn't have enough functionality to manage tasks and code across the larger team, which can be changed by bringing in features and improving existing ones. The open source friendly principle helps in easy access to new and coming code content aligned with our interests to explore and use in our own applications and products, something that lacks in other SCM productsĬons: A consistent documentation system like Confluence would be really helpful. Github actions suited our build needs fairly well, and integration with solutions like Netlify for CI-CD was a breeze. While its competitors like Bitbucket have sought to target the enterprise market and focus on large scale corporate projects, Github is much more small team friendly as there's no added baggage of figuring out the platform, and rather, we can just focus on doing what we came to do. We wanted to focus on delivery, not the process and Github provided what we needed - source code management, collaboration, project management the easiest, and the cheapest. Pros: Familiarity is the first word that comes to mind, for a small, fast output team. Community support is also much better with Github
For teams where staying up to date with the open source world is a necessity or an advantage, Github is hands down the best, given trending issues and repos are very very informative. Unlike other competitors, Github has focused on its core offering of source code management and easy collaboration, and thus, avoided unnecessary platform weight. "Easy to use and familiar for small teams, where cross product integration is not a priority"Ĭomments: We use Github to maintain our private platform code repositories, that our team uses, as well as our open source repos to build the community, which is a major factor for us choosing Github.
0 kommentar(er)
